However, the anesthetic that dripped from the pain pump into Beale’s shoulder joint killed the cells that create cartilage. Within months, Beale’s cartilage was completely destroyed, causing him so much pain he couldn’t shake his clients’ hands or even pick up his baby without a shockwave of pain. He now faces a complete shoulder replacement that doctors say will likely not permanently resolve his chronic pain or enable him to regain his active lifestyle.

Beale’s doctor had no idea that the pain pump he had prescribed Beale was not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). He later discovered that 49 patients he had treated with the I-Flow pain pump had similar complications following surgery.

Last week, an Oregon jury awarded Beale $5.5 million for damages caused by the pain pump device that was not approved by the FDA. Attorneys representing Beale and his wife, Krista, said that I-Flow knowingly marketed its On-Q Painbuster device to orthopedic surgeons even though the FDA had repeatedly rejected the device for lack of safety data. Beale’s award includes $1.75 million in damages to Krista Beale.

The Beales were represented by Paulson Coletti law firm and Williams, Love, O’Leary & Powers, P.C. Attorneys with Beasley Allen Law Firm are working with Williams, Love, O’Leary & Powers, P.C. on all pain pump cases. Currently, Beasley Allen and the Williams firm have the largest number of pain pump clients, with approximately 60 cases filed, and intention to file additional cases.

In November 2009, the FDA issued a warning to doctors that it had never approved such use of pain pumps during shoulder surgery. But some worry that there are many more people suffering from similar debilitating injuries caused by pain pump devices, who may not even realize the pain pump is to blame. Getting the message out to physicians and patients is key to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Jury awards man $5.5 million for shoulder injury caused by pain pump

A recent study published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine first brought to light the connection between chondrolysis, a condition in which the cartilage has been eroded away, and the use of pain pumps during and following surgery. This type of chondrolysis, characterized by the complete loss of articular cartilage from the humeral head and glenoid, has been associated with intra-articular injection of dye, and with the post-arthroscopy infusion of local anesthetic into the joint.

Sixty-six cases of chondrolysis associated with shoulder arthroscopy followed by the intra-articular pain pumps with local anesthetic were identified among men and women between the ages of 15 and 57. Fifty-five of those patients had normal joint surfaces at the time of arthroscopy. All patients who suffered from chondrolysis suffered from pain and loss of motion that began between 91 to 1,650 days following surgery.

While pain pumps are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to deliver pain medication into the shoulder tissue, they are not approved for use with the catheters placed directly in the joint space, as pain pump manufacturers had instructed surgeons. It is believed this non-approved practice led the anesthetic to erode the cartilage in the shoulder.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Surgeons discuss characteristics of chondrolysis caused by pain pumps

It is Dr. Carrese’s opinion that “to do otherwise would be a failure of expected ethical and professional conduct, and in turn a failure of good clinical practice.”

The opinion addresses the “ethical and professional obligations of orthopedic surgeons to patients who have had arthroscopic shoulder surgery in conjunction with postoperative use of a pain pump device that infuses medication continuously via a catheter directly into the shoulder joint and who are therefore at risk for developing severe pain and disability of the shoulder joint secondary to a condition known as chondrolysis.”

Dr. Carrese is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Director, Program on Ethics in Clinical Practice, at Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University.

This recommendation follows a report from the FDA distributed today to health care professionals following a review of 35 reports of chondrolysis (necrosis and destruction of cartilage) in patients given “continuous intra-articular infusions of local anesthetics with elastomeric infusion devices to control post-surgical pain.” According to the study, 97 percent of the reported cases of chondrolysis followed shoulder surgeries.

The FDA report says early adverse affects following pain pump use after surgery included joint pain, stiffness, and loss of motion, occurring as soon as two months after surgery. In half the reported cases, the FDA report notes, patients required additional surgery, including arthroscopy or arthroplasty (joint replacement).

A number of lawsuits have been filed on behalf of patients suffering from chondrolysis as a result of pain pumps being inserted directly into the cartilage rather than into the muscle tissue following surgery. The FDA only approved pain pump use as inserted in the muscle tissue, but the lawsuits allege pain pump manufacturers marketed the devices to physicians with instructions to insert the catheter into the joint for faster and more efficient pain relief.

However, studies show that introducing the anesthetic medications directly into the joint in this manner destroys the cartilege and results in chondrolysis.

Read the Ethics Recommendation Letter.

Read the FDA Report.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Doctors have obligation to tell former patients about pain pump risks

One of the complainants, Glen Gore, says a Stryker pain pump was implanted in his shoulder after repair surgery in December 2002. After using the pain pump, he was had lost almost all of the cartilage in his shoulder joint, is unable to raise his arm above shoulder level, and now needs replacement surgery.

Gore is among hundreds of patients who are suing the manufacturer of the pain pumps used in shoulder surgery after the pain pumps caused serious and likely permanent injury to their shoulders. The problem dates back to the early 2000s, when pain pump manufacturers began instructing doctors to place the catheter of the pain pump directly into the shoulder joint. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had previously approved its use with the catheter placed in the shoulder tissue but had rejected the manufacturers’ request to have the alternative catheter placement approved, citing the need for studies to ensure the safety.

Placed in the shoulder joint, the catheter dripped medicine that began eating away at the cartilage. Doctors soon began to make the connection between the pain pumps and a condition known as chondrolysis, or specifically Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis. As a result, pain pump manufacturers like Stryker are facing numerous lawsuits from individuals who have been irreversibly harmed by their product.

Source: Boston.com

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › More lawsuits filed against maker of shoulder pain pumps

The culprit was not the surgery itself but the device used to deliver pain medication to the wound site. Used properly, as approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the pain pumps were hardly dangerous. But pain pump manufacturers began advising surgeons to use the pain pumps differently, by inserting the catheter directly into the shoulder joint space. Over time, the pain medication was toxic to the cartilage, resulting in chondrolysis.

In 2008, a petition was filed for a multidistrict litigation (MDL) to consolidated the lawsuits pending against the manufacturers of pain pumps. MDLs help coordinate the litigation that is pending in federal courts across the country involving the same allegations or same parties. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decides whether cases should be consolidated under MDL and where to transfer the cases. The judicial panel denied the initial petition requesting an MDL. Many more lawsuits have been filed in federal courts across the country and the panel may revisit its initial decision.

“Denial of the MDL  may be a good thing for patients and consumers because there are already cases that are going to trial,” Woodson says. Several of those cases were settled right before or after the opening statement and others were resolved on a confidential basis in early 2009.

“These are substantial injury cases. This is a very severe injury that should not have occurred,” Woodson says. “Most of these people did not know what occurred to them until they started seeing advertisements from lawyers for these cases. So, that’s the first time that they had any inkling in their mind that there could have been a connection between the use of a pain pump and what’s ultimately happened to their shoulder.

“I’d advise (individuals who believe they may have been injured by the pain pump) that people  see an attorney as soon as possible. ”

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Pain pump makers may be liable for injury after shoulder surgery

Crisp, who has not played since June 12, was put on the disabled list and restricted from all swinging and throwing activities. “Obviously, that’s not a good sign,” says general manager Dayton Moore.

Once thought of as a career-ending injury, torn labrums can be repaired and one’s throwing ability restored. Recovery usually takes several weeks. It also can be considered a safer procedure than in years past, when the device used to alleviate pain following surgery ended up causing more damage and, in many cases, rendering the shoulder useless.

Intra-articular pain pumps are devices that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to deliver medication through a catheter placed directly into the tissue near the wound site. In the early 2000s, pain pump manufacturers asked the FDA if the catheters could be placed directly into the shoulder joint rather than the tissue. The FDA said no; more testing would be required.

Instead of working the proper channels to get the alternative use approved, pain pump manufacturers began advising surgeons to place the catheters into the shoulder joint. As a result, patients began suffering from a condition known as chondrolysis. Chondrolysis is the disappearance of cartilage in the shoulder resulting in joint narrowing and stiffness. In some cases, shoulder replacement may be necessary.

The improper use of pain pumps has ceased, but those injured by the devices are just beginning to experience problems and as a result numerous lawsuits have been filed against the manufacturers of pain pumps.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Royals’ Crisp may need shoulder surgery

The labrum is a cartilage found in the shoulder’s ball-and-socket joint where the arm meets the body. It serves to deepen the socket so that the ball stays in place and helps stabilize the arm. When the labrum is torn due to injury, the ball may slide part or all of the way out of the socket. Symptoms of a labral tear depend on where the tear is located, and may include an aching sensation in the shoulder joint, catching of the shoulder when moved, and pain during physical activity.

Treatment for a torn labrum depends on the type of tear. They often do not require surgery; however, patients with persistent symptoms that do not respond to other therapies may need surgery. Recovery from surgery usually depends on where the tear occurred and how severe the tear was. Typically, it takes four to six weeks for the labrum to re-attach itself to the rim of the bone and another four to six weeks to strengthen and fully heal.

A majority of patients regain full functioning of their shoulder after labrum repair, but that was not always the case. Just a few years ago orthopedic surgeons began seeing more and more patients suffering from a painful and debilitating condition known as chondrolysis in patients who had had shoulder surgery. The condition was traced back to pain pumps used to deliver medication to the shoulder joint for up to 72 hours after surgery.

An investigation found that pain pump manufacturers were advising doctors to insert the pump catheters directly into the shoulder joint rather than the tissue, as was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As a result, more than 140 lawsuits have been filed in state and federal court against manufacturers of pain pump devices.

Source: Johns Hopkins Medicine

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Recovery more likely after shoulder surgery than in years past

Labrum repair surgery requires months to heal because the fibrocartilage has a poor blood supply. During surgery, the labrum is stitched together and anchored to the bone. It generally takes about six months for the tissue to heal. Typically, surgeons perform authroscopic surgery to repair shoulder injuries in patients and often use pain pumps to help alleviate pain for up to 72 hours following surgery. Pain pumps offer an alternative to narcotics and pain killers; however, misinformation about how the pain pumps should be used provided by pain pump manufacturers years ago have resulted in debilitating – and for some athletes, career-ending – injury to the shoulder joint.

The injuries stem from a change in the way pain pump manufacturers began to market the devices to surgeons, according to Frank Woodson, shareholder for Beasley Allen Law Firm. When the pain pumps were originally approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the pump’s catheter was to be placed in the shoulder tissue. However, in the 1990s and early 2000s, pain pump manufacturers began advising surgeons to place the pain pump catheters in the joint space, or intra-articular area, allowing pain medication to go directly into the joint space. This use had not been approved by the FDA. Shortly after the pumps were used in the inappropriate manner, per the advice of the pain pump manufacturers, “doctors began to see patients suffer severe damage to their shoulder cartilage that we’ve rarely seen before,” Woodson said.

What resulted was the loss of cartilage, or joint space, commonly called chondrolysis. It leads to severe pain because the cartilage in the shoulder space is gone, causing bones to rub together. As the condition progresses, patients may require shoulder replacement and it makes normal daily activities painful and difficult.

There are approximately 140 lawsuits filed by people who have been injured by misuse of these pain pumps. All are pending in state and federal courts throughout the country. “There are many more cases under review across the country and there will likely be many more filed,” Woodson said. “As patients and physicians learn more about the link between pain pumps and chrondrolysis, I think you’ll see many more people come forward.”

Source: Google: AFP

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Magic’s Nelson plays just months after shoulder surgery

The nine are among a growing number of lawsuits filed against the makers of shoulder pain pumps that were used in patients following shoulder surgery. The devices have a catheter that is implanted into the surgical site and delivers regular does of anesthetics to the wound for up to 72 hours. Doctors soon began to see a connection between the use of the devices and a painful and debilitating condition known as chondrolysis.

The pain pumps were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the catheters placed in the shoulder tissue, but in the 1990s pain pump manufacturers sought approval from the FDA to have the catheters placed directly in the shoulder joint.

“To the FDA’s credit, they said no,” says Frank Woodson, shareholder with Beasley Allen Law Firm. “The FDA said, ‘If you want permission to do that, you’re going to have to do safety studies to determine whether or not that is a safe practice or a safe method to use your product.’ The companies did not do that and just went ahead and started advising physicians to place the pain pump catheter in the joint space.”

When the catheters were placed in the shoulder joint instead of the tissue, the medication began to eat away at the cartilage in the joint, causing the painful condition known as chondrolysis.

As a result, more than 140 lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts against manufacturers of pain pump devices. “I hope this litigation will continue to educate the medical community to use pain pumps in a proper manner because if it is done in that way, then we should stop seeing these injuries occur,” Woodson said.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Lawsuits seek more than $68 million from pain pump manufacturers

Zone maintains that the cover of I-Flow’s On-Q pain pump contains holes that allow latex to come in contact with patients and health care professionals. The company contends that individuals who come in contact with the pump and suffer a latex reaction may not be properly treated based on the assumption that the I-Flow product does not pose a latex risk. Zone is the worldwide distributor for the Solace pain pump, which has a latex-free design.

I-Flow may want to take a closer look at patient safety. The company is one of several pain pump manufacturers – a list that also includes Stryker Corporation, DJ Orthopedics Inc., and Breg Inc. – facing lawsuits from plaintiffs that allege the pumps have caused lifelong and painfully debilitating shoulder injury. Lawsuits contend that manufacturers of pain pumps instructed physicians to use the pumps in a manner that was not approved by the FDA for shoulder surgery.

Instead of implanting the catheter of the pain pumps into the shoulder tissue as was FDA approved, surgeons were instructed to place the catheters into the shoulder joint area. Doing so allowed medication to drip into the shoulder joint and essentially eat away the cartilage, causing bone to rub against bone and resulting in a serious, irreversible condition known as chondrolysis.

Source: PR Web

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › I-Flow pain pump manufacturers face more lawsuits

The company’s Regional Anesthesia sales, which includes the company’s flagship On-Q product lines, also increased 9 percent during the same quarter, according to the report.

There are approximately 140 lawsuits against manufacturers of pain pumps, including I-Flow Corporation, currently pending in state and federal courts throughout the country, says Frank Woodson, shareholder with Beasley Allen Law Firm. That number has jumped considerably since the summer of 2008, as more and more evidence began to link pain pumps to a serious and debilitating shoulder injury known as chondrolysis.

Pain pumps are commonly used by surgeons when performing shoulder surgeries. The pump, which sits outside the body but is attached to a catheter that is implanted into the surgical site, delivers medication for up to 72 hours. Once all the medication has been injected, the catheter is gently pulled out by the patient.

Pain pump manufacturers were given Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to market the devices with the catheter in the shoulder tissue. In early 2000, manufacturers sought to have FDA approval to put the catheters directly into the shoulder joint but the FDA rejected the request. However, pain pump manufacturers went ahead and instructed physicians to implant the catheter in the shoulder joint. The medicine that dripped into the shoulder joint area ate away the cartilage in the shoulder joint causing the painful and debilitating condition known as chondrolysis. There is no cure for the condition and in some cases, more surgery may be required.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Pain pump manufacturer enjoys gains despite mounting lawsuits

But during a game in October 2006, McKeown’s left shoulder was injured while trying to recover a fumble. Doctors implanted the catheter of a On-Q PainBuster pain pump manufactured by I-Flow into his shoulder joint. For up to 72 hours, medication gradually dripped into his shoulder and slowly began eating away at the cartilage.

But McKeown was tough. He rehabbed quickly and bulked up to 300 pounds. He lead the team in weightlifting statistics, bench pressing a maximum of 460 pounds. His chances at making to the NFL one day seemed promising.

Even as he worked out, he ignored the burning pain in his shoulder, refusing to admit to anyone how badly it hurt. And then he injured his shoulder again. Once again, he was put on an I-Flow pain pump that dripped medication into his shoulder joint. A follow up MRI revealed a horrible mess. The promising athlete’s shoulder cartilage had been worn down so badly that repairing it was impossible. McKeown’s hopes for a professional football career were ruined.

McKeown is now suing I-Flow, the manufacturer of the pain pump, after he and his doctor learned that a 2006 study had revealed that by inserting the pain pump’s catheter in McKeown’s shoulder joint instead of the muscle tissue, the medicine essentially destroyed his shoulder. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had granted approval to have the pain pump’s catheters inserted into the muscle tissue, but denied manufacturers’ request to instruct surgeons to place the catheters in the shoulder joint. As a result, countless patients have suffered similar fates as McKeown.

Source:
Cincinnati.com

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Athlete’s hopes of playing pro ball dashed by shoulder pain pump

Pain pumps are devices that hold pain medication that is gradually released into the shoulder tissue through a catheter implanted in the surgical site. Once the pain medication has been released into the joint, the catheter is removed by the patient. When used properly, pain pumps offer a convenient alternative to oral or intravenous painkillers for those undergoing shoulder surgery. And most patients can expect a good recovery following physical therapy.

However, in the late 1990s manufacturers of pain pumps sought FDA approval to have the catheters placed directly in the joint area, rather than the shoulder tissue. “To the FDA’s credit, they said no,” says Frank Woodson, shareholder with Beasley Allen Law Firm. “The FDA said, ‘If you want permission to do that, you’re going to have to do safety studies to determine whether or not that is a safe practice or a safe method to use your product.’ The companies did not do that and just went ahead and started advising physicians to place the pain pump catheter in the joint space.

“They never studied it and they never obtained FDA approval,” he says. As a result, physicians began seeing their patients with a debilitating condition called chondrolysis, or a narrowing of the cartilage. As the cartilage begins to wear away, bone rubs against bone causing pain and disability. In many cases, shoulder replacement is required.

Approximately 140 lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts against manufacturers of pain pump devices and several cases are set for trial in 2009. “I hope this litigation will continue to educate the medical community to use pain pumps in a proper manner because if it is done in that way, then we should stop seeing these injuries occur,” Woodson said.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › FDA told pain pump manufacturers ‘no,’ but they refused to listen

“I think what we’re seeing is that physicians are finally seeing the relationship between pain pumps and chondrolysis – especially since the first lawsuits were filed a couple years ago,” he says. “In addition, literature is now being published about the connection between the pumps and chondrolysis. So, the more information that becomes available, the more people are learning what may be causing their shoulder problems.”

The problem traces back to about the year 2000, when pain pump manufacturers began advising physicians to place the device’s catheter into the joint space, or intra-articular area. The catheters were intended and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be placed into the shoulder tissue, and not the joint space. As a result, medicine was feeding directly into the joint space causing the cartilage to gradually wear away. This narrowing of the cartilage, called chondrolysis, causes severe pain and disability. There is no cure for the condition and many individuals are faced with lifelong disability as a result.

Recently, a study published by The American Journal of Sports Medicine identified intra-articular pain pumps as the likely cause of chondrolysis.

“People who had surgery seven or eight years ago who thought they had recovered are now seeing that they’re losing their cartilage and they don’t know why,” Woodson says, adding that several cases are set for trial in 2009. “I think that you’re going to see juries return verdicts against these defendants and then others will start to file lawsuits as well.”

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › More lawsuits filed as link made between pain pumps, chondrolysis

However, in the 1990s and early 2000s, pain pump manufacturers began to market the product differently, according to Beasley Allen shareholder Frank Woodson. “The catheter was intended and approved by the FDA to be placed into the shoulder tissue. (But) with advice from manufacturers, the pain pump catheters were being placed in the joint space or intra-articular area, which allowed the pain medication into the joint space.”

By advising surgeons to use the pump in such a manner – one that had never been approved by the FDA – tragedy ensued. “Doctors began to see patients suffer severe damage to their shoulder cartilage that we’ve rarely seen before,” Woodson said.

What resulted was the loss of cartilage, or joint space, commonly called chondrolysis. It leads to severe pain because the cartilage in the shoulder space is gone, causing bones to rub together. As the condition progresses, patients may require shoulder replacement and it makes normal daily activities painful and difficult.

There are approximately 140 lawsuits filed by people who have been injured by misuse of these pain pumps. All are pending in state and federal courts throughout the country. “There are many more cases under review across the country and there will likely be many more filed,” Woodson said. “As patients and physicians learn more about the link between pain pumps and chrondrolysis, I think you’ll see many more people come forward.”

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Pain pump manufacturer’s bad advice leads to ‘tragedy’

Post-operative pain pumps are a pain-management system that deliver medication directly to the surgical wound. The pumps came under fire recently after The American Journal of Sports Medicine linked intra-articular (or post-operative) pain pumps to cases of Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis, a progressive degeneration of the cartilage in the shoulder resulting in pain and loss of motion. Chondrolysis is a chronic condition that often requires surgery.

Until the 1990s, the pumps delivered medication at a limited flow rate. In the late 1990s, manufacturers increased the amount of anesthetic used in the pain pumps. The lawsuit contends that continuous injection of the high-volume anesthetics into the shoulder can cause serious and permanent damage to the joint cartilage in the shoulder. The lawsuit also claims the pumps were marketed without first doing studies to determine the safety of the high-volume pain pumps or what damage could have occurred, instead encouraging use of both the pain pumps with the high doses of anesthetics.

“The plaintiffs are demanding compensatory damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty,” according to the report.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › Pain pump manufacturers named in lawsuit

According to the October 2007 issue of The American Journal of Sports Medicine, cases have been studied and it has been reported that a strong association between the intra-articular use of high volume pain pumps following arthroscopic shoulder surgery was linked to an unexplainable loss of cartilage in the shoulder joint.

To fully understand why these pumps can cause the loss of cartilage, the reader must understand how the pain pump works. The pain pump, inserted during the surgery, delivers high concentrations of pain medication to the surgical site.

Original product information instructs physicians to insert the pain pump into muscle tissue.  However, many physicians were instructed by representatives marketing the pain pump to insert the pain pump between the joints, into cartilage, to increase the effectiveness of the pump. This usage was never approved by the FDA.

When the pain medication is delivered into the cartilage, it actually kills the cartilage, resulting in severe pain, stiffness in the shoulder and, for most, joint replacement surgeries.

Dr. Charles Beck, an orthopedic surgeon and head of the study of pain pumps, believes that thousands of patients nationwide have been affected negatively by these devices.

SOURCE: Pain Pumps › The pump that doesn’t ease the pain