Another lawsuit filed against pain pump manufacturers

March 9th, 2010 by Jennifer Walker-Journey

judge gavelMichael Johnson says neither he nor his doctor would have agreed to have a pain pump devices implanted into his joint during two arthroscopic surgeries if he knew that by doing so it would result in a full joint replacement. Johnson contends that the manufacturers of the medical device knew that the pain pumps were unreasonably and dangerously defective, and yet they did nothing to warn him or his surgeon about the risks associated with using it. Furthermore, he claims, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) specifically prohibited the marketing of pain pump devices with anesthetics to be placed in the joint cavity.

Johnson is suing Moog Inc., Stryker Corp. and Stryker Sales Corp., McKinley Medical, Curlin Medical and Linvatec Corp. for economic, non-economic and punitive damages resulting from use of his pain pump.

are balloon-like medical devices filled with medication that rest outside the body. The device has a catheter that is placed into the area and feeds medication to the surgery site for up to 72 hours. When all the medication has been used, patients simply pull the catheter out of the body. While the have reduced hospital stays and provided relief immediately following repair surgeries, the long-term effects can be dangerous. The anesthetic used in the eats away at the cartilage in the joint, leading to a debilitating condition known as chondrolysis.

occurs when cartilage in the joint wears away causing bone to rub against bone. Those with have pain in the joint and limited mobility. Many require joint replacements.

Several people treated with pain pump devices following shoulder surgery have developed this once-rare condition, and many are joining Johnson in the fight against pain pump manufacturers for justice.

Source: The Southeast Texas Record

blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.