Doctors have obligation to tell former patients about pain pump risks

November 13th, 2009 by Wendi Lewis

pain pump shoulderIn light of a recent report released by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration that confirms the link between chondrolysis and pain pump use, Joseph A. Carrese, MD, MPH, an expert in bioethics, has issued an opinion stating that physicians have a responsiblity to inform former patients on whom they used the device of the possible risk.

It is Dr. Carrese’s opinion that “to do otherwise would be a failure of expected ethical and professional conduct, and in turn a failure of good clinical practice.”

The opinion addresses the “ethical and professional obligations of orthopedic surgeons to patients who have had arthroscopic shoulder surgery in conjunction with postoperative use of a device that infuses medication continuously via a catheter directly into the shoulder joint and who are therefore at risk for developing severe pain and disability of the shoulder joint secondary to a condition known as .”

Dr. Carrese is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Director, Program on Ethics in Clinical Practice, at Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University.

This recommendation follows a report from the FDA distributed today to health care professionals following a review of 35 reports of (necrosis and destruction of cartilage) in patients given “continuous intra-articular infusions of local anesthetics with elastomeric infusion devices to control post-surgical pain.” According to the study, 97 percent of the reported cases of followed shoulder surgeries.

The FDA report says early adverse affects following use after surgery included joint pain, stiffness, and loss of motion, occurring as soon as two months after surgery. In half the reported cases, the FDA report notes, patients required additional surgery, including arthroscopy or arthroplasty (joint replacement).

A number of lawsuits have been filed on behalf of patients suffering from as a result of pain pumps being inserted directly into the cartilage rather than into the muscle tissue following surgery. The FDA only approved use as inserted in the muscle tissue, but the lawsuits allege manufacturers marketed the devices to physicians with instructions to insert the catheter into the joint for faster and more efficient pain relief.

However, studies show that introducing the anesthetic medications directly into the joint in this manner destroys the cartilege and results in .

Read the Ethics Recommendation Letter.

Read the FDA Report.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.