Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.

The season is over for Kansas City Royals outfielder Coco Crisp, who will undergo surgery to repair a torn labrum in his right shoulder. Royals manager Trey Hillman calls it a “pretty big blow” to the team. Crisp, who began experiencing pain in his shoulder last April, hasn’t played since June 12 after the pain in his shoulder began hampering his production. Prior to going on the disabled list, Crisp’s production dropped from .239 to .261.

“When you lose someone like that,” Hillman said to The Kansas City Star, “it’s tough to replace. We tried to protect it, and we rested him a couple of times, but it’s just one of those things that needs to be repaired.”

The surgery will end the season prematurely for Crisp, but it shouldn’t hamper his chances for a full recovery. But for hundreds of individuals who had surgery for repairs like a torn labrum in the shoulder, the pain treatment turned out to be more painful and debilitating than the torn labrum itself.

The problem traced back to a pain pump device that is designed to deliver pain medication directly into the shoulder tissue for up to 72 hours following surgery. With the catheter placed in the shoulder tissue, the pumps were effective.

However, in the early 2000s, pain pump manufacturers advised surgeons to place the catheter in the shoulder joint. As the pain medication dripped into the joint rather than the tissue, it began eating away at the shoulder cartilage. The result was a painful condition known as chondrolysis, or specifically Postarthroscopic Glenohumeral Chondrolysis. The condition has caused greater disability and in some cases, shoulder replacement surgery was required.

Hundreds of lawsuits have since been filed against manufacturers of the pain pumps. Patients who have used a pain pump to regulate pain following shoulder, knee, hip, ankle or back surgery, should consult their doctor if they experience continued pain; weakness in the shoulder; clicking, popping or grinding in the shoulder; or a decreased range of motion. Individuals who have been injured by an intra-articular pain pump may have a claim against the manufacturers.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 at 9:25 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.